27 July 2008
The Chief Constable
West Midlands Police
Lloyd House
Colmore Circus
Queensway
Birmingham B4 6NQ
Dear Chief Constable
Because the post office clerk when I posted the following to you at the Merry Hill shopping centre yesterday (26 July) typed in the wrong postcode for the Special Delivery bar-code, I am sending another copy, as below:
I wrote to you on 7 July 2008 explaining that (almost certainly) our bungalow had been entered improperly about 26 June 2008 or 27 June 2008 when we were away (each of those dates) in London. The perpetrators had introduced contamination into bottles of water we had in stock causing us a most unpleasant ‘tummy bug’ problem on drinking some of the water, including diarrhoea. I requested you to ensure police investigated my complaint more vigorously than police have in the past. A letter I received from DI Magee saying he did not regard my request as a complaint appears genuinely to be in answer to my letter to you, and therefore I am writing this further letter to point out the difficulties I face which I believe the police ought to help counter.
There is a widescale organisation whose main purpose has entailed causing problems to myself (and my wife since I got married three years ago) the most severe of which are caused by drugs foisted on us (I use the term foisting). I do not believe the people foisting the drugs understand the hardship the drugs cause me: or certainly in the past they have not. Because of unwillingness of the police to investigate the improper measures this organisation takes I myself need to go to extraordinary lengths costing me money, time and effort, to try to defend myself (and my wife) mainly from ingestion of unwanted drugs. The difficulty I face is further increased by (as I mentioned) the wide scale of the influence of the organisation I am speaking of. (Also, of course, the fact that statements such as these might be interpreted by people without full knowledge - unless they investigate fully - as symptoms requiring treatment with antipsychotic drugs is not a help to me and in the past has created great fear in me, that is fear of being administered antipsychotic drugs these drugs having some of the worst effects any drugs do have on me.)
As an example of the difficulty I face additional to difficulties another person in Britain might face were he in a similar position to my own but the organisation foisting the drugs having less widespread power: I have tried to set up a website anthonydewarmondlivesat36abittellroad.org.uk and after working initially (for about one day) it is no longer accessible (when I last checked). The reason, I have absolutely no doubt, is influence brought to bear on the website hosting company I use - 123-reg.co.uk - by the organisation I am speaking of. It may be that the website has been barred for a reason which if I knew it I would agree with (possibly so as not to prejudice the minds of potential jurors if the man Armond is ever brought to justice) but as things stand I cannot be sure. If I were to pursue what on the face of it is the obvious course - asking 123-reg to rectify the matter - I would run up extra costs in money, time and effort, these costs unfairly thrust on me. And as I say, it might be that the reason for the interference with the usual procedures at 123-reg is a reason I would agree with anyway.
What I should be able to do - given that the police do not have resources or otherwise are unwilling to protect me from on the face of it illegal intrusions - is go to a solicitor and expect him to assist me in putting to rights this problem in my life. As I explained in my letter to you of 7 July, solicitors I have approached in the past (such as Rose, Williams & Partners of 2 Waterloo Road Wolverhampton) have not been willing to give me reasonable help because they have been told in advance (by representatives of the organisation I am speaking of) that I am mentally unsound and it would not be worth their while to take me on as a client.
To repeat briefly what I said in my letter of 1 May 2008: over a number of decades I was treated improperly for mental illness. The basis of my diagnosis (of schizophrenia) was behaviour which I had exhibited for which I was not myself responsible because I was affected by drugs I was given without my foreknowledge or consent. There has been evidence quite recently that these allegations I make are accurate. I must regard those perpetrating these crimes (as on the face of it they are) as wholly lacking in moral sense, to pursue this course knowing how difficult it will be for me to convince those who should help me (not only the police but my MP, and solicitors I might wish to engage) of the truth of such wild-sounding accusations.
With my letter of 7 July I annexed evidence that the Royal Mail has over decades been treating mail sent to me, and from me, in a special manner, and in the 1970s (in the 1970s certainly) this resulted in cash sent to me going missing.
In conclusion I repeat my request that police should be more vigorous in assisting me to put a stop to the interference in my life, especially that which involves the foisting on me of drugs to which I have a very unpleasant reaction.
Yours sincerely
Colin Barrass-Brough
barrass-brough.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment